Rich Morin wrote:
> I have considered that and may end up doing so, but it would
> mean tracking the changes to the original task, which is the
> kind of maintenance sinkhole I try to avoid.

The original task uses a rake standard RDocTask.  Of the six lines that 
configure it, three consist of selecting the right files (which is the 
part you want to change) and the other three set the document directory, 
the title and a few options.

Doesn't seem to be too onerous.

Now, duplicating the "doc:rails" task would be another issue.

-- Jim Weirich



-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.