Trans wrote:
>> In any case, you're talking about metaprogramming operations *on*
>> method names (removing them, using method_missing), which is different
>> from the matter of naming methods because what those methods do is
>> metaprogramming.
> 
> Yes, exactly. And I think this is what Daniel really meant too.

I meant both, really. I named about 5-6 "problems" that each benefited 
from this naming scheme. Even though each of them was pretty small, 
taken together I think they have weight. When one solution solves 5-6 
problems, that's the smell of good design to me.

Daniel