On 3/1/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky / gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/1/07, Clifford Heath <no / spam.please.net> wrote: > > dblack / wobblini.net wrote: > > >> This is ready to be made a gem when I've done the unit tests. I think > > >> I'll call it "checked". > > > How about "chattr"? :-) > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > > > Chattr is in Rubyforge now, with RDoc, (new) RSpec tests > > Right on! Nice to see someone using the rspec-0.8 syntax only a day > after its release. And, if I might say so, "nice specs". Take it as > you will. > > Cheers, > David Actually - I see that chattr_spec.rb is in the test directory. If you make that a spec directory instead, then tinderbox will, in theory, know what to do with it. Also - the syntax you're using won't work with anything before 0.8.0, so I'd make the gem statements reflect that instead of "> 0". gem 'rspec', ">= 0.8.0" Cheers, David > > all tied up > > with a nice Rakefile to build the gem and test it. Only SVN access, > > I'll get a proper release file and announcement up in the next few > > days. You might like a sneak peek though :-). > > > > Clifford Heath. > > > > > >