Hi!

On Jan 27, 2007, at 04:40, Marco Guiseppe wrote:

> Yes, that makes sense. I've even found a much simpler solution to my
> original problem that makes the question irrelevant.
>
> Thanks, everyone!

I would like to notice, that if you ever need two separate objects, you 
can always use a dup method, e.g:

string2 = string1.dup # Will have two different string instances

Your sincerely,
Damian/Three-eyed Fish