Pit Capitain wrote:
> In this blog post
>
>
> http://moonbase.rydia.net/mental/blog/programming/concurrency-five-ways.html
>
> MenTaLguY shows how to implement a thread-safe queue using five
> different concurrency models found in Ruby and other languages. He shows
> how they would look like in Ruby and explains how they would work.

Very interesting stuff, especially in light of the fact that I was just
going over the Fortress spec the other day, and I've already spotted
one similarity:

atomic do
   ...
end

Yep, the Fortress syntax and the syntax Mentalguy came up with are
identical. Coincidence? I think not.

Will we be getting parallel for loops, too? ;)

Regards,

Dan