On 1/5/07, Trans <transfire / gmail.com> wrote:

> > > but it's possible NOW.  see the latest annouce on the list!
> >
> > Oh, sorry ara.  I was actually talking about the arrow.
>
> The arrow is more ugly!? in that case try writting some heavy meta-code
> using Pervasives and __(obj) and let me know how it goes ;-)  [trust me
> I've done it].

No.  I see the arrow to be equivalent to __(obj) and prettier than an
explicit Pervasive object.
I suggested the arrow since it was the best I could come up with, but
I should have read the thread before to see it was already suggested.
I would have been kinder then, perhaps, since I thought I was making
fun of myself :)