Robert Dober wrote:
> I guess it is very reasonable what you are saying and yet I`d wish to have
> a SmallRuby, something squeakish you see. First that might really make the
> difference for both languages and secondly it might as well turn out to be
> faster and more agile  than YARV or JRuby (well JRuby for sure as the used
> language is just faster - Smalltalk just fits better to Ruby than Java).

You do know that Smalltalk, even in its fastest incarnations, is still 
slower than Java, right? And Squeak is far from being one of the fastest 
incarnations.

-- 
Charles Oliver Nutter, JRuby Core Developer
Blogging on Ruby and Java @ headius.blogspot.com
Help spec out Ruby today! @ www.headius.com/rubyspec
headius / headius.com -- charles.nutter / sun.com