M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> There is also the "agility" factor. Ruby and Rails seem inextricably 
> intertwined with the agile movement, and I think splitting the list up 
> would be a step backwards in that respect.

What... in the spirit of newbies "pairing" with oldbies?

Actually, what if, in an attempt to emulate rotating pairs, we make the 
listserv randomly not deliver some messages to some people? That'll cut 
down on the amount that everybody has to read, but without being 
unnecessarily divisive!

Oh, wait...

Devin