Subject: Re: What we have here...
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:25:06 +0900
References: 231600231601231603
In-reply-to: 231603
On 29.12.2006 01:42, atbusbook / aol.com wrote:
> Sorry blank post. but saying ruby has no encapsulation of methods is
> funny, it is pretty stupid if you ask me.
Where exactly do you read that in the article?
Regards
robert