On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Paul Lutus wrote: > James Edward Gray II wrote: > >> On Dec 19, 2006, at 7:52 AM, Jeremy McAnally wrote: >> >>> This is why many times there will be "xxx-talk" (or "xxx-users") and >>> "xxx-newbie" lists. I think perhaps Ruby has reached that "critical >>> mass" point where this split is in order (even though i'm sure this >>> has been discussed a number of times and decided against). >> >> I was on perl-beginners for years. When I came to the Ruby community >> I asked for the equivalent, but many members felt it wasn't needed or >> even desired. While I think I came around to their point of view >> over time, I'm not sure it still holds. >> >>> Though, many would probably argue that "no experienced programmer >>> would visit the newbie list." >> >> I've seen this argument multiple times, but it certainly doesn't hold >> true in the Perl community. See perl-beginners and Perl Monks. >> Plenty of knowledgeable help on both. I enjoy helping others and >> stayed on the list to do so when I was past the beginner stage, as >> just one example. >> >>> To make this whole thing effective, though, the residents of this >>> list >>> would have to be stringent about telling people to "take it to the >>> newbies" if their question is something that belongs there. >> >> Now this I don't feel is needed or desired. I don't think we want to >> start turning anyone away, period. There's no reason questions can't >> still be answered here. > > I've had this debate in a number of forums for different languages > over the > years, and I have always taken your position on this. If a newbie > newsgroup > were to be set up, IMHO it would decrease the quality of the > replies to > newbies, and in some cases lead to a "blind leading the blind" > syndrome. > > Also, where this has been tried, it sometimes leads to newbies > gradually > abandoning the newbie newsgroup because of the poor quality of > replies and > also to avoid the stigma of posting to a newbie newsgroup. Again, see perl-beginners and Perl Monks. This just isn't the case there, though that is the extent of my experience in this area. James Edward Gray II