In article <j7ZA7.55709$gT6.28530023 / news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com>,
David Simmons <pulsar / qks.com> wrote:
>"Phil Tomson" <ptkwt / shell1.aracnet.com> wrote in message
>news:N%KA7.115365$DY1.4131031 / sjcpnn01.usenetserver.com...
>> In article <NDBBKPEKEKOELOHKPCNOCEDNCHAA.rich / infoether.com>,
>> Rich Kilmer <rich / infoether.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Ned Konz [mailto:ned / bike-nomad.com]
>> >> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:37 PM
>> >> To: ruby-talk ML
>> >> Subject: [ruby-talk:22888] Re: I need some help!!
>> >> .
>> >> .
>> >> .
>> >> One dialect of Smalltalk that bears watching in the next few
>> >> months is QKS'
>> >> SmallScript. This is a very ambitious project with probably the
>> >> most advanced
>> >> VM technology currently available. It is more or less a superset of
>> >> Smalltalk, and will also run in the Microsoft .NET environment.
>> >>
>> >> David Simmons has done very interesting work on SmallScript. He's
>posted
>> >> quite a few times on comp.lang.smalltalk; you might want to read
>> >> his postings.
>> >>
>> >> Interestingly, David has also been interested in Ruby...
>> >
>> >..and David attended the Ruby conference.  David's SmallScript VM is
>> >more interesting in more than just architecture (which I believe is
>> >incredible).  He is looking to support multiple languages atop the VM.
>> >Microsoft's CLR does not currently meet the needs that dynamic languages
>> >(such as Ruby) impose.  We had some interesting talks about support for
>> >Ruby on the SmallScript VM.
>> >
>> >As Matz works toward the next-generation bytecode-based Ruby (Rite), I
>> >hope David's VM is seriously evaluated as a base platform.
>> >
>> I just checked the smallscript website and it looks like the SmallScript
>> VM is not OpenSource, so how can we use it for Ruby?
>
>Hi folks.
>
>The SmallScript VM (AOS Platform) will be free.

Will it be 'free' as in the source code will be available?
If not, can you help out with the development of Rite? ;-)

Phil