Hi!

Mark Hahn <mchahn / facelink.com> wrote:
>        arr1.concat = arr2
> The syntax is unambiguous and this would be very logical.

	If we're talking about this, some time ago I wished to have
	more universal setters and getters for virtual parameters.

Example:
	class C
	  def initialize(something)
	    @internal = something
	  end
	  def virtual_variable
	    @internal
	  end
	  def virtual_variable=(something)
	    @internal = something
	  end
	  def virtual_variable<<(something)
	    #someprocessing
	    #pretend to be array like variable
	  end
	end

In current version you cannot define other than method and method= for virtual
variables.

	But then I realized that grammar parser would be quite hard to write,
if you enable this.

	So ignore this :-))

		Michal

PS: Why do I write this post then? I really DON'T know ;-)

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Michal Rokos                           Czech Technical University, Prague
E-mail: m.rokos / sh.cvut.cz                                  ICQ: 36118339
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-