On 07.12.2006 12:56, Martin DeMello wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond / 9online.fr> wrote:
>>
>>   I vote for this function, although the name, join_with, really isn't
>> telling what it's doing (it doesn't speak to me, unlike most ruby method
>> names).
> 
> I've settled on Enumerable#jmap in my personal code - it fits my
> thinking, because I'm focusing on the map, and the join is secondary.

The I'd spent at least three or four more characters - your current 
naming lets me think of some javaism. :-)

	robert