Le 1 d?cembre 2006 ? 23:30, James Edward Gray II a ?crit : > On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Robert Klemme wrote: >>> http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/227459 >> I cannot see that it is a HTML posting - in fact, I do not see any >> HTML in that posting. Is it possible that the gateway rejects >> multipart messages? James, if you need the source (or what reached >> my gmail box) let me know and I forward it to you. I'd like to see the whole raw message, headers included (my email is valid, please attach the whole message, (g)zipped, or it will be bounced by my _personal_ filters). > Fred, can you comment on this? The link above shows pretty much how > the rejected message was formatted. Are you sure the mailing-list archive software doesn't filter out HTML ? A multipart message with only one part sounds quite unlikely to me. James, maybe the gateway should save the rejected messages somewhere, if only temporarily, don't you think ? Anyway, I'm using cleanfeed on the server, an omnipresent filtering package. It's usually quire reliable, even if it has to use some complicated heuristics from time to time (since MIME isn't widely used on Usenet). It's a quite standard version, with a bit of tweaking, but not in that domain. Why am I telling you all of this, you ask ? Well, even if it is a false positive, if I tune my filters to let the message pass, it will anyway have a really bad distribution, being rejected by most of the hosts that run the same soft. > James Edward Gray II Fred -- Sometimes I sleep, sometimes it's not for days The people I meet always go their separate ways Sometimes you tell the day By the bottle that you drink And times when you're all alone all you do is think (Bon Jovi, Wanted Dead or Alive)