dblack / wobblini.net wrote:

/ ...

>>> Why can't it be a string, I can use whatever I want to identify an
>>> object.
>>
>> 1. I can see why this thread goes on so long -- instead of meeting my
>> request, you just changed the subject.
> 
> Paul, could you please stop being so confrontational?

There isn't one word about Ruby in your post. That places you post in a
well-known category, one that should always be marked [OT].

> Your standards are no higher ...

On the contrary, as I just demonstrated.

-- 
Paul Lutus
http://www.arachnoid.com