On Nov 30, 7:59 pm, "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <z... / cesmail.net> wrote:
> > 1900) unless they are divisible by 400 (like 1600 and 2000, which were
> > in fact leap years)."2000 was a Leap Year? No wonder I'm a day late!

Actually, that would make you a day early ;-)

Still awaiting advice on the original or on getting Chris' suggestion
to work...

Best
Idris