Phrogz wrote:
> Hrm, I assumed that using #each_with_index would be speedier, since
> there would be no Ruby call to the #[] method of the array for each
> iteration. Instead, it's much slower:
Hrm, that is odd. I assure you it was purely by accident that I picked 
the faster implementation. Maybe it has something to do with 
each_with_index being implemented by Enumerable, vice Array? I dunno 
why.... should just delegate to each, and keep a counter around.

?
Devin