------art_46235_1264058.1164254882607
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 11/23/06, dblack / wobblini.net <dblack / wobblini.net> wrote:
>
> Hi --
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Gabriele Marrone wrote:
>
> > Morton smartly pointed out that elements can be arrays themselves. So,
> should
> > we treat them as any other kind of object and compare them with 
> > I guess we should want to recursively apply our equality concept given
> by the
> > OP.
>
> We still don't have a ruling :-)  I guess there are three
> possibilities:
>
>    1. shallow -- just use on nested arrays
>    2. deep -- flatten nested arrays
>    3. recursive -- do the comparison on nested arrays
>
> I've been assuming #1, but any of them could be interesting to
> implement.


For my purposes at the moment flatten is fine.  But seeing your posts on it
recently and considering the fact that I said it could be arbitrary
elements, I guess #1 would probably be the go.

------art_46235_1264058.1164254882607--