Lou Scoras wrote:
> On 11/17/06, Robert Klemme <shortcutter / googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In that case (!) I would definitively use a Hash as Justin suggested.
>> This is /much/ more efficient and also you gain flexibility in filling
>> that Hash (i.e. load it from some config file vs. making it part of the
>> code) if you need that.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>         robert
> 
> Agreed.  You can also extend a table solution at runtime if need be.

Great and thanks for everyones help and sample code snippets hopefully 
in time I can help out :)
 I will give this a try today.
Sc-


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.