On 11/10/06, Tanner Burson <tanner.burson / gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/06, Leslie Viljoen <leslieviljoen / gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/10/06, Luke Melia <lkmlists / lukemelia.com> wrote:
> > > How about picking a small slice of the app and doing two week-long
> > > spikes, one with each technology? That should be enough to let you
> > > have a more informed group discussion than you can now. Hopefully,
> > > consensus will emerge. If not, you can make your decision but your
> > > team will at least feel their ideas were given a shot.
> >
> > Great idea!
>
>
> Also, if you do end up looking back at C#, take a look at Monorail[0].  It's
> an excellent framework to replace ASP.NET's page flow, with a more true MVC
> architecture.  It borrows a lot from Rails, but not to the point of porting
> features that just won't work.  Definitely something to check out!
>
> [0]http://www.castleproject.org/monorail


Ah thanks, I am already using Castle ActiveRecord.
We do what little we can.


-- 
Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather
than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always
astounded me. We long for a caring Universe which will save us from
our childish mistakes, and in the face of mountains of evidence to the
contrary we will pin all our hopes on the slimmest of doubts. God has
not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist.

- Prokhor Zakharov