Hi,

In message "Re: Concerns about removal of continuations in Ruby 2.0"
    on Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:08:45 +0900, "Alder Green" <alder.green / gmail.com> writes:

|1. Certain control flow structures rely on continuations:
|2. Existing 3rd-party packages rely on continuations:
|3. Certain possible features and packages need continuations:

Yes, yet they are few.  What I said were:

  * Ruby 1.9.1 will not have continuation, since they have lowest
    priority and are difficult to implement efficiently.

  * no promise (neither positive nor negative) on continuation for
    1.9.2 or 2.0, for exact same reason above.

							matz.