Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb / NASA.gov> writes:

> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> I'm curious as to why you say this exceed's rspec? I'm not looking
>> for
>> a battle here, there are enough people using rspec that if there's
>> some perception of missing goodness, I'd like to know what we can add
>> to it.
>
> I haven't looked a rspec in a while, but test/spec seemed
> to give all that rspec offered, plus the ability to bridge
> the two worlds if you so chose.

One part that test/spec doesn't implement intentionally is mocking,
but in the darcs trunk, at least flexmock and mocha work nicely.

Also, RSpec has better Rails integration---I may port/write this some
day, but I'm not using Rails at the moment.

Patches and additions are welcome, of course.

> Bil Kleb
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen / gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org