Cameron, Gemma (UK) wrote:
> Again I love how this mailing list always sounds like it's talking about
> me... ( : 

Secretly, we are...

Hal



> Gem
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: list-bounce / example.com [mailto:list-bounce / example.com] On Behalf
> Of Dr Nic
> Sent: 11 October 2006 12:59
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: newgem - Create gems for your libraries and apps
> 
>                *** WARNING ***
> 
> This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an
> external partner or the Global Internet. 
>      Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 
> 
> Robert MannI wrote:
> 
>>This is great. You're cooking up one sweet Ruby library after another.
>>
>>Calling it "gemify" isn't an option? Sounds sweeter.
> 
> 
> Unfortunately all voting on project names happens before the project is
> released. That is, I voted alone between: newgem, gemnew, new_gem,
> gem_new. You get the jist of my unimaginative options.
> 
> I like gemify as a command name though. Perhaps I'll add it in the bin
> folder as a duplicate, just for you :)
> 
> Nic
> 
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
> 
>