Subject: Re: nil being empty
From: "Seth Thomas Rasmussen" <sethrasmussen gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 05:10:15 +0900
References: 218209218353218371218467218470218471218509
In-reply-to: 218509
I'm just not that concerned about the issue.
I could see how it would be handy in some contexts. I could also see
how some of those contexts could have created a more sensible API that
would not have avoided this issue.
Whatever.