Ken Bloom wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:37:01 -0700, gregarican wrote:
>> o - Are licensing terms a concern? Qt isn't totally 100% free, open
>> source software if you are using it for commercial purposes.
> 
> You've gotta ask yourself, though: how would you protect a commerical
> investment in an interpreted language that can't even be compiled to
> bytecode?

The same way you protect *any* investment -- by soliciting the advice of
competent attorneys and accountants and following their advice. It's got
only marginally anything to do with technology.