Ken Bloom wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:37:01 -0700, gregarican wrote: >> o - Are licensing terms a concern? Qt isn't totally 100% free, open >> source software if you are using it for commercial purposes. > > You've gotta ask yourself, though: how would you protect a commerical > investment in an interpreted language that can't even be compiled to > bytecode? The same way you protect *any* investment -- by soliciting the advice of competent attorneys and accountants and following their advice. It's got only marginally anything to do with technology.