Ara.T.Howard wrote: > > yes, it will require deep ruby and 'c' knowledge > > http://codeforpeople.com/lib/ruby/acgi/acgi-0.1.0/README > > and, obviously > > http://codeforpeople.com/lib/ruby/acgi/ > > i think it's a potentially powerful idea. if you know how to make it > faster, > please do so and send in a patch. at this point only a factor of 2x is > need > to close the gap on fastcgi. at this point the emphasis is on making it as > fast as possible. scalibility and portability might come next. > > good luck. > > -a this is a great thing - could it make it into ruby 2 std lib ( or did i get something wrong) ?