Jeremy Kemper wrote:
> 
> Eric demonstrated a memory leak in code that shouldn't. Terminology-wise, I
> think that safely falls under the 'bug' rubric.
> 
> His algorithmic improvements are cool & welcome but are only related to 
> this
> bug inasmuch as they were introduced in the same patch.

I follow you now. I do agree a true memory leak is a bug.
I was trying to figure out how the algo changes were related
to the bug fix, but I guess as you say they are tangential.


Hal