On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:44:32PM +0900, khaines / enigo.com wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Devin Mullins wrote:
> 
> >Well, part of that is mindshare. Consider that the Nitro, IOWA authors 
> >wrote the Mongrel adapters themselves (for the most part). In this case 
> >you could call the Mongrel API the Ruby version of WSGI.
> 
> At the end of the day, the IOWA/Mongrel integration is a trivial thing, 
> and something like WSGI could hardly make it easier than it already is 
> without imposing design decisions on me.
> 
I think that was exactly Devin's point. (Is that it's so trivial, Ruby
doesn't need such a standard.)