ara.t.howard / noaa.gov wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Robert Klemme wrote:
>
>> ara.t.howard / noaa.gov wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Patrick Hurley wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah that was my first thought too, but notice he is constructing a
>>>> new date at the beginning of the month. I am guessing he picked 42,
>>>> over 32 as it is just much better number.
>>>
>>> exactly ;-)
>>>
>>> the point is that it always lands into the next month.
>>
>> Or the month after that - depending on where you start. :-)
>
> sure - but it always starts on the first day of the month:

Yes, of course.  I didn't want to insunuate you code would not do what you 
claimed it to do.  It was merely a silly remark, probably stirred up by this 
strange number that I haven't seen in a while.  I am sorry.

Kind regards

    robert