On 9/21/06, Paul Lutus <nospam / nosite.zzz> wrote:
> Berger, Daniel wrote:
>
> / ...
>
> >> Haven't you been reading the technical press lately? You are
> >> doing your employer a disservice by seeming to use your QWest
> >> soapbox (your status as a QWest employee) to criticize a book
> >> publisher.
> >
> > <rant snipped>
> >
> > What in the world are you talking about?  Qwest is a telecom.  We do not
> > publish books.  There is no conflict of interest here.
>
> Right. And George Bush is not a religious leader. It is all in how people
> see things, not what they actually are. You are not paying attention to
> appearances.
>
> > And there was no criticism in my question.
>
> No one said or implied that there was. I called it a personal grievance --
> that seems accurate.
>
> > Please, don't try to guess why I'm asking - it won't work.
>
> Too late for that. You are far too transparent.
>
> And you are posting on matters having nothing remotely to do with your
> employment, on company time. Your argument that there is no conflict of
> interest is a double-edged sword -- it means you shouldn't be spending
> company time on it.

But how do you know the policies of anyone's company? Do you also work
for Qwest?
You are surely in the minority if you never post to mailing lists in
your work time!

Oh, are we arguing about silly things again?
:-)