On 19.09.2006 21:12, Ola Bini wrote:
> Actually, the name is more about the fact that you can use regular 
> duck-type techniques (like respond_to?),

I do not think that the use of respond_to? is a regular duck typing 
technique.  As Eric put it, respond_to? is exactly not applied regularly 
when duck typing.

Don't get me wrong, I don't say your lib is useless (in fact I envision 
numerous uses for test cases etc.) but I think this claim of yours is wrong.

Kind regards

	robert