gwtmp01 / mac.com wrote:

>> But the point is "do" receives
>> items and
>> operates on them one at a time, then exits when its stream is empty.
> 
> This just doesn't sound right to me.

I was wrong. I should have thought a bit more deeply about what I was
saying. See my other post on this topic.

-- 
Paul Lutus
http://www.arachnoid.com