Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> Yvon Thoraval wrote:
>>> Le 6 sept. 06  18:38, Suraj N. Kurapati a crit :
>>>> Doxygen is better suited for this task:
>>>> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
>>> however, it seems to me, they are not speaking about ruby ???
> 
> Correct, they are not speaking of documenting Ruby. Instead, they
> are speaking of using RDoc on C++ code.
> 
> Doxygen is better suited for C and C++.
> RDoc is better suited for Ruby.
Yeah ... I have Doxygen installed. I suspect RDoc will do just fine on
"vanilla C" code, but I also suspect C++ will break it.