David Vallner wrote:


> 
> But Dr. Dobbs'  point -is- valid, exposing someone to that by default, 
> heck, without a WYSIWYG alternative is just vile - even if it's 
> technically a very good alternative to HTML, it's an annoying We Know 
> What's Good For You Better Than You Do attitude to your users / 
> customers. 

It seems more like a  "We're offering an option for people who prefer 
Textile to WYSIWYG or hand-coded HTML, since no one is forced to use any 
of these tools, and choice is good" attitude.

The reviewer missed this same point.

-- 
James Britt

"Blanket statements are over-rated"