On 8/27/06, Henry Savr <hsavr / yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thank you, guys for trying to fix the code. Sure, I had 1001 way to fix
> it and I did.
> The reason for the post was to inform community about the case. For me
> with a long dinosaur's tail of various languages it is unexpectable yet,
> however I could understand the logic behind it.
>
> Is it a bug or feature, I do not know. At least it was something, people
> should know ;-)

It was a bug in your code. You used [0..value] when you should have
used (0..value).

Cheers,
Max