On 8/27/06, Henry Savr <hsavr / yahoo.com> wrote: > Thank you, guys for trying to fix the code. Sure, I had 1001 way to fix > it and I did. > The reason for the post was to inform community about the case. For me > with a long dinosaur's tail of various languages it is unexpectable yet, > however I could understand the logic behind it. > > Is it a bug or feature, I do not know. At least it was something, people > should know ;-) It was a bug in your code. You used [0..value] when you should have used (0..value). Cheers, Max