Trans wrote:

> I do have one pressing issue though. I came up with two ways to run the
> code. 1) using eval, and 2) using a pipe. The first is better b/c I can
> maintain the line numbers, so that error reports point to the right
> place. OTOH the second way allows all the normal command line options
> that ruby handles to be passed along. I would like to achieve both of
> these rather than one or the other. Both methdos are presented in the
> code below. Any ideas on how to fix?

Wow. No one has any ideas on this? Hmm.. maybe a more specific
question:

Is there away to pass the ruby command a __LINE__ offset? Or set it in
code?

T.