Chad Perrin wrote:

> 
> Considering my reply was to someone's overenthusiastic critique, and was
> not specifically intended as a contribution to the new design, and
> considering I'm not seeking employment, I think that veiled insult
> misses the mark.  

Nothing veiled, no mark to miss; there was no insult intended. 
Different situations, as you described.  It merely brought to mind how 
such requests have varying degrees of purpose.

> Thanks for playing, though.

Thanks for bringing the cards.


-- 
James Britt