On Aug 21, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> Which, as has been shown can be provided without changes to the base
> specification/implementation of Ruby.

A ordered hash implementation in the standard library would be better
than nothing.  Similar to the way that Set is not in Core but is in
the standard library.

A literal syntax would be a bonus but of course would require a change
to core.


Gary Wright