Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> Using an ordered hash for one
> person's benefit would kill the speed and jack up memory usage.
> 
> [..] but replacing the Hash is not the way to go.

I don't think anyone is suggesting replacing the
existing Hash.  As I see it, the ordered hash would
merely be an alternative to the standard hash.

Regards,
--
Bil
http://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov