Martin DeMello wrote:
> On 8/21/06, Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb / nasa.gov> wrote:
> 
> You can do this automatically (if you aren't already) by creating an
> object that holds a hash and an array, defines []=, each and delete to
> do the right thing, and delegates missing methods to the hash.

Hmmm... good idea.  I've largely missed out on the
whole method_missing idiom.  Sounds like a good use.

I'll try to look into it after I return from JPL next
week.  However, if you'd like to throw down an example,
I might be able to work it in now...

Thanks,
--
Bil
http://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov