Luke Kanies wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Robert Klemme wrote:
> 
>> Luke Kanies <luke / madstop.com> wrote:
>>> By far the easiest way to do this is to stick them in a hash:
>>
>> I'd say Jeffrey's approach (i.e. stick those arrays into an array)  
>> is by far
>> the easiest and hassle free approach.  Your approach has the  
>> disadvantage
>> that it will loose creation order because alphanumeric sorting of  
>> names like
>> "a1", "a2" etc. will only work until "a9".
> 
> Sure; if you need to be able to sort based on name, use an array, I
> suppose.  OP implied naming was more important than ordering, which
> usually means a hash, but either is sufficient, clearly.

Thanks to all of you...I used your suggestions and my code is working 
fine

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.