Subject: Re: double_metaphone.rb
From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:25:06 +0900
References: 208978209023209026209178209180209185
In-reply-to: 209185
Tim Fletcher wrote:
> Not sure whether you're referring to the function or the memoization -
> is it the memo hash _keys_ you think should be stored as symbols, or
> the double_metaphone return _values_?
Both.
Cheers,
Daniel