--- Charles D Hixson <charleshixsn / earthlink.net> wrote:
> I have the beginnings of a string parser here, but the
> style feels  wrong.  Is there a more Ruby-esque way to do
this 
> that doesn't rely  on using the built-in Tree function?  

I don't claim to be an expert on Ruby-esque style. In fact,
many folks would argue that my style is somewhat outside
the Ruby mainstream.

Anyway, I took a shot at refactoring the code. You can find
the whole story here: 
http://www.qualitycode.com/refactoring.html

Kevin


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com