Trans wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm glad you bring this up. Are you actively using
> this call? As you hopefully noticed from the docs, this variation of
> Hash#each comes with a WARNING:
> 
>   # WARNING! Use with caution. Methods from other libraries
>   # may depend on the old behavior, expecting a two element
>   # array to be passed into a single block argument.
> 
> I'm "abstractly" of the opinion that this alternate definition makes
> more sense, nonetheless it may just be TOO danagerous for practicel use
> b/c of the compatability issue. Would others concur? Or is it safe to
> use in limited circumstance as I have been assuming?

No, I'm not using it, I'm just reading through some of the Facets source 
code :)

As Ara pointed out, this may not even work as expected, so perhaps it 
would be better to remove it all together.


P.S. I've made a few suggestions on the Facets wiki

Cheers,
Daniel