Hal Fulton wrote:
> Robert Klemme wrote:
>>>
>>> So yeah, I ended up using an array of arrays. But it
>>> just felt wrong.
>>
>>
>> To me a Hash feels wrong.  Why?  Because you don't make any use of 
>> hash properties for fast lookup.  You just iterate in plain order.
>>
> 
> I never use a hash for fast lookup. I use it because it
> allows me easily to associate an arbitrary key with a
> value.

Um...  So you're saying that you wouldn't bother if lookups were O(n)?  Wow!

Kind regards

	robert