On Aug 12, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:

> Is there any particular reason that the traditional approach seems  
> to be
> to use %w{a b c} rather than %w[a b c] (the latter of which seems even
> more sparing of the fingers)?

I'm a big fan of %w[ .. ].  I love how it looks similar to [ .. ],  
only for words instead.

James Edward Gray II