ts wrote:
> T> Indeed the source code tells us what it calls the thing (singleton 
> T> class), but should that forbid us from adopting a different, less 
> T> ambiguous term when writing about and discussing the concept?
>
>  It's ambiguous only for you :-)

If that were true, we wouldn't be having this discussion. =)

Also, see the "nonce" thread going right now for others struggling with 
the less-than-stellarness of the currently used "singleton class".

Tom

-- 
Tom Werner
Helmets to Hardhats
Software Developer
tom / helmetstohardhats.org
www.helmetstohardhats.org