I would certainly be happy for that to happen.

Cheers,
        Nat.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Thomas" <Dave / PragmaticProgrammer.com>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:20702] Re: ANN: Ruby/Mock 1.0


> "Nat Pryce" <nat.pryce / b13media.com> writes:
> 
> > Ruby/Mock is a package that makes it easy to implement mock objects
> > in RubyUnit test cases. It provides a generic Mock class that can be
> > used to create mock objects for any interface.  A test uses closures
> > to define the expectations of a mock object.  Tests can also
> > encapsulate protocols into reusable mock-object classes.
> 
> I've been playing with this for a couple of days now, and I like it a
> lot. I'm wondering if it should make it's way into the standard
> RubyUnit or Lapidary (or both) distributions, so that when one of them
> gets rolled into the standard Ruby distribution (hint, hint) we'll
> have this capability too.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> Dave
>