ara.t.howard / noaa.gov wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Peter Hickman wrote:
>
> > Perhaps stepping up to a 6 x 6 grid would allow more meaningful timings?
>
> showing how it performs on a 2, 4, and 8 grid would show how it scaled...
>
> -a
> --
> happiness is not something ready-made.  it comes from your own actions.
> - h.h. the 14th dali lama

It scales badly

        0.496s gcc 5x5 (without print statements)
30055.098s gcc 6x6 (without print statements)

imo If Peter has figured out what he's trying to do then it would be
smart to find a better way of doing it rather than scrabbling for small
percentage improvements.