"Schaefer, F." wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just finished porting the GetPot command line and input file
> parser to Ruby. I really might need some input though, since I
> had to rename some member functions, such as the function
> operator -> 'call(..)' and 'next(..)' -> 'nekst(..)'.
> Is this too daring ?

You might want to rename GetPot itself, before you attact undue
attention from the DEA.
> 
> Have a look at the GetPot home page:
> 
> http://getpot.sourceforge.net
> 
> Please, give me comments - I might have overlooked some little
> subtle inconsistencies.
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> 
> Frank.

-- 
"It requires wisdom to understand wisdom:
 the music is nothing if the audience is deaf."
 - Walter Lippman